Hella KGaA Hueck
36 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Bremen 1
20.04.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Fair payments. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Hamm 2
21.11.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Hamm 3
04.09.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Hamm 4
14.11.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Hamm 5
10.05.2020
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Hamm 6
20.05.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Hamm 7
01.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hamm 8
24.03.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hamm 9
02.03.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Hamm 10
02.03.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Hamm 11
01.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 12
22.01.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 13
04.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 14
08.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Interesting tasks. Recommendable workplace.
Germany 15
06.06.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 16
15.01.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Recommendable workplace.
Germany 17
08.01.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 18
10.03.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 19
01.01.2023
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 20
30.05.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Lippstadt 21
04.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Lippstadt 22
27.02.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Impeccable Leadership. Excellent activity. Excellent employer.
Lippstadt 23
08.07.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Lippstadt 24
06.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Lippstadt 25
20.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Lippstadt 26
21.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Below-average salary. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Lippstadt 27
31.10.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Lippstadt 28
16.02.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. Fair payments. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Lippstadt 29
06.10.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Lippstadt 30
05.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Lippstadt 31
02.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Satisfactory employment site.
Lippstadt 32
02.12.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Lippstadt 33
03.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Reasonable job provider.
Lippstadt 34
17.04.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Recklinghausen 35
17.05.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Recklinghausen 36
22.05.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Reasonable job provider.
